Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to provide a multicast virtual private network (MVPN)

ABSTRACT

Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to provide a multicast virtual private network (MVPN) are disclosed. An example method includes sending a multicast receiver route received from one of a multicast service processor or a provider edge router to another of the multicast service processor or the provider edge router, wherein the multicast service processor is communicatively coupled to the provider edge router via a multicast control plane topology that is non-congruent to a unicast control plane topology, and replicating multicast data received from the other of the multicast service processor or the provider edge router to the one of the provider edge router or the multicast service processor based on the multicast receiver route.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure relates generally to networks and, more particularly, tosystems, methods, and articles of manufacture to provide a multicastvirtual private network (MVPN).

BACKGROUND

In a known service provider communication network, an edge node, such asa provider edge router (PER), interfaces customer premises equipment(CPE) with the provider network. The edge node, in turn, directly orindirectly interfaces with the network node(s) implementing the providernetwork. Examples of such network nodes include area border routers(ABRs) that define the interfaces between the provider's core networkand the edge segments of the provider network (e.g., containing the edgenodes), core routers implementing the core network, autonomous systemboundary routers (ASBRs) interfacing different provider networks, etc.

Multicasting is a feature offered by provider networks to enable sendingdata from a single customer data source communicatively coupled to anedge node (referred to as a root edge node or root node) to be conveyedvia the network node(s) implementing the provider network to multiplecustomer data receivers communicatively coupled to one or more otheredge nodes (referred to as leaf edge nodes or leaf nodes). Priortechniques to perform multicasting generally involve the root edge nodereplicating copies of the multicast data for each leaf edge node, and/orthe network node(s) maintaining state information for a multicast treeused to route the multicast data through the provider network from theroot edge node to the various leaf edge node(s).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known network to send multicast data.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example network constructed inaccordance with the teachings of this disclosure and including multicastservice processors to send multicast data.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example implementation of a multicastservice processor of FIG. 2.

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate an example network such as the network ofFIG. 2 during an example method to initialize a multicast path for amulticast transmission and transmit multicast data.

FIGS. 5A-5B are a flowchart representative of example machine readableinstructions which may be executed to implement an example ingressmulticast service processor.

FIGS. 6A-6B are a flowchart representative of example machine readableinstructions which may be executed to implement an example egressmulticast service processor.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example processing platform that mayexecute the example machine readable instructions of FIGS. 5A-5B and/orFIGS. 6A-6B to implement the example multicast service processor of FIG.3, and/or to implement the example area border routers, the exampleprovider edge routers, and/or the example network of FIG. 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To support multicast virtual private network (MVPN), multicastprotocols, such as protocol independent multicasting (PIM) and/orpoint-to-multipoint MPLS based protocol, are employed in the core andedge networks. Using multicast protocols that build multicast trees inthe core and edge networks provides better bandwidth efficiency at theexpense of backbone routers (BRs) control plane resources. The multicasttree uses a separate data plane than the data plane used by unicastmultiprotocol label switching (MPLS) infrastructure. As a result,customers may experience inferior quality with multicast than withunicast. However, based on the past 2 to 3 years of MVPN data analysis,the inventors of this patent found that a majority of applications are(1) low-data rate, (2) small fan-out (e.g., few and/or concentratedreceiver nodes), or (3) both low-data rate and small-fan-out. Somebursty multicast applications only send few periodic packets, butgenerate a significant amount of churn in both provider edge routers(PERs) and BRs by building and tearing down short-lived multicast trees.Known methods of multicasting are also prone to MVPN PIM adjacencyflapping which requires time and resources for troubleshooting. Withknown multicast technologies, BRs are likely to exhaust their controlplane resources to maintain large numbers of multicast states and are atrisk of instability due to the dynamic nature of building and tearingdown multicast trees. In addition, separate multicast specific networkmanagement tools are required to support multicast based technology. Thepotential instability can make critical multicast applications unusableand/or unreliable. Reliability is important in many applications. Forexample, the Federal Aviation Administration uses multicast tocommunicate airplane positions to air plane control towers around theUnited States.

To overcome the above-noted deficiencies of the prior art, examplemethods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosed hereinprovide a non-congruent design to implement MVPNs using Border GatewayProtocol (BGP) capabilities to overlay the MVPN service over a unicastMPLS infrastructure. Example methods, apparatus, and/or articles ofmanufacture disclosed herein are scalable to handle increasing numbersof multicast flows. In some such examples, scalability is achieved byremoving multicast state management from the BRs and/or providingseparate unicast and multicast control plane management at the BRs. Insome examples, the BRs are Area Border Routers (ABRs) in an OpenSwitched Path First (OSPF) zero area. In some example methods,apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosed herein, the ABRs inthe OSPF zero area are provided with multicast service processors (MSPs)to provide and manage the multicast control plane and data planeservices separate from the ABRs. Some example MSPs also provide aRendezvous Point (RP) to implement legacy MVPN services such as theknown MVPN methods described above. Example methods, apparatus, and/orarticles of manufacture disclosed herein trade-off a modest amount ofbandwidth efficiency to achieve control plane resource efficiency andsimplicity in supporting MVPN applications. The efficiency andsimplicity gained by these examples provides the ability to scalemulticast and unicast services while providing substantially equivalentcustomer experience quality for both multicast and unicast services.

A disclosed example method includes sending a multicast receiver routereceived from one of a multicast service processor or a provider edgerouter to another of the multicast service processor or the provideredge router, and replicating multicast data received from the other ofthe multicast service processor or the provider edge router to the oneof the provider edge router or the multicast service processor based onthe multicast receiver route.

A disclosed example multicast service processor includes a control planecontroller to receive a first multicast receiver route, to store thefirst multicast receiver route in a multicast routing table, and to sendto one of a second multicast service processor or a provider edge routera second multicast receiver route based on the first multicast receiverroute, and a data plane controller to replicate first multicast datareceived from the second multicast service processor or the provideredge router based on the first multicast receiver route.

A disclosed example article of manufacture comprises machine readableinstructions which, when executed, cause a processor to at least send afirst multicast receiver route received from a first one of a multicastservice processor or a provider edge router to a second one of themulticast service processor or the provider edge router, and toreplicate multicast data received from the second one of the multicastservice processor or the provider edge router to the first one of theprovider edge router or the multicast service processor based on thefirst multicast receiver route.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known network 100 to send multicast data.The example network 100 of FIG. 1 implements a two-level OSPF hierarchy.A first or backbone OSPF level of the communication system 100 isreferred to herein as “OSPF zero area” (or “area 0”) 102. AdditionalOSPF areas (e.g., OSPF area M 104 and OSPF area N) at a second or lowerlevel of the communication system 100 are referred to herein as “OSPFnon-zero areas” and are communicatively coupled to each other via theexample OSPF zero area 102.

Each of the OSPF non-zero areas 104, 106 of the network of FIG. 1includes one or more PERs. As used herein, a PER is a router implementedat the edge of a service provider's network that is communicativelycoupled, via one or more communication paths but without any interveningrouter, to a customer edge router (CER) implemented at the edge of acustomer's network. More than one CER may be communicatively coupled toany of the PERs (e.g., PER1 and PER2). One or more area border routers(ABRs) couple corresponding ones of the OSPF non-zero areas 104, 106 tothe OSPF zero area 102. Each of the PERs (e.g., PER1 and PER2) iscommunicatively coupled to one or more ABRs. As used herein, the termABR refers to a router configured to communicatively couple an OSPF zeroarea to at least one OSPF non-zero area. Thus, as shown in FIG. 1, ABRs,which have multiple interfaces and participate in and/or are configuredto operate in multiple areas, communicatively couple the OSPF non-zeroareas 104, 106 to the OSPF zero area 102. Of the ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4)depicted in FIG. 1, ABR1 and ABR2 communicatively couple the OSPFnon-zero area M 104 (i.e., PER1 and PER2) to the OSPF zero area 102, andABR3 and ABR4 communicatively couple the OSPF non-zero area N 106 to theOSPF zero area 102.

The known network 100 of FIG. 1 provides MVPN services to customersconnected to the network 100 according to one or more of the followingdraft protocols: “RFC 6037 Cisco Systems' Solution for Multicast inBGP/MPLS IP VPNs,” October 2010; “Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)Internet Draft for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs,” Jan. 28, 2010,(draft-ietf-13vpn-2547bis-mcast-10.txt); and/or “Internet EngineeringTask Force (IETF) Internet Draft for BGP Encodings and Procedures forMulticast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs,” Oct. 1, 2009,(draft-ietf-13vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp-08.txt). The MVPN services providedby these draft protocols and the network 100 create multicast routingand forwarding states, which are a function of (Customer-source,Customer-group) states (e.g., (C-s, C-g) states, Forwarding EquivalentClasses associated with (C-s, C-g) states) in the ABRs (ABR1-ABR4). Themulticast states significantly burden the control plane resources of theABRs (ABR1-ABR4). Further, the multicast states are constantly presenteven when customers are not running multicast because the states areused to instantiate a MVPN among PERs (e.g., implementation based on RFC6037 noted above). As a result, the network 100 of FIG. 1 providesdifferent customer experiences for multicast traffic than for unicasttraffic. For instance, unicast traffic enjoys millisecond restoration(after connectivity failure) performed by the ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4),while multicast traffic has substantially longer restoration times.While multicast is designed to be bandwidth-efficient, the MVPN servicesprovided by the network 100 may be bandwidth inefficient for SessionDescription Protocol (IETF RFC 4566, July 2006)-like (SD-like) multicastapplications. For instance, on average, sending one SD-like data packetrequires the network 100 to process 80 multicast control packets,causing significant bandwidth and/or control plane inefficiency. Due tothese limitations, the network 100 of FIG. 1 has limited scalability forproviding MVPN services to customers and may cause different and/orundesirable customer experience quality for multicast applications thanfor unicast applications.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example network 200 constructed inaccordance with the teachings of this disclosure to send multicast dataincluding multicast service processors (MSPs) (e.g., MSP1-MSP4). Theexample network 200 of FIG. 2 overcomes the foregoing deficiencies ofthe known network of FIG. 1 in providing MVPNs by separating the controlplanes for multicast and unicast services. In the example of FIG. 2, theMSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) are coupled to respective ones of the ABRs (e.g.,ABR1-ABR4). In contrast to the ABRs in the network 100 of FIG. 1, theexample ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) of FIG. 2 do not manage multicast statesand, instead, handle only unicast states. The example MSPs (e.g.,MSP1-MSP4) of FIG. 2 manage the multicast states and the propagation ofmulticast data from sources of the multicast data to the receivers ofthe multicast data.

The example network 200 of FIG. 2 is a scalable MPLS-based communicationsystem. The scalable MPLS-based communication system is implementedusing a hierarchical OSPF architecture as defined or described in anypast, present and/or future standard and/or recommendation such as IETFRFC 2328 for OSPF Version 2, April 1998, which is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety. The example network 200 uses link-stateadvertisements (LSA) to distribute routing information and/or routeselection criteria as defined or described in any past, present and/orfuture OSPF standard and/or recommendation such as IETF RFC 2328.However, other protocol(s) may be used to distribute and/or determinelink state and link cost information. Example information that may beincluded in an OSPF LSA include, for example, attached interfaceidentifiers and route selection metrics.

The example network 200 of FIG. 2 includes an OSPF zero area 202 similarto the OSPF zero area 102. Additionally, the example network 200 of FIG.2 includes two OSPF non-zero areas M and N 204, 206, which are similarto respective ones of the OSPF non-zero areas M and N 104, 106 ofFIG. 1. The example OSPF non-zero areas of FIG. 2 are configured at thesame level of hierarchy of the OSPF routing protocol. While the examplenetwork 200 of FIG. 2 includes one OSPF zero area 202, and two OSPFnon-zero areas 204, 206, other example communication systems may includeany number of OSPF non-zero areas at the same or different levels,and/or more than one OSPF zero area. Each of the example OSPF areas 202,204, 206 of FIG. 2 implements a respective network having any numberand/or type(s) of routers connected via any number and/or type(s) ofcommunication path(s), protocols, and/or topology(ies). Additionally,while the example OSPF zero area 202 is depicted as having four ABRs(e.g., ABR1-ABR4) and a corresponding four MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4), theOSPF zero area 202 may have any number of ABRs and MSPs. While the PERs(e.g., PER1-PER4) are depicted in the example of FIG. 2 as coupled tothe ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) and the MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4), they may becommunicatively coupled via any number and/or type(s) of intervening orintermediate router(s) and/or link(s). Further, an ABR may be configuredin more than one non-zero OSPF area.

The example MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) and PERs (e.g., PER1-PER6) of FIG. 2collectively implement a non-congruent topology to decouple multicastcontrol plane from the ABRs. As used herein, a non-congruent topologyrefers to a multicast control plane topology that is non-congruent witha unicast control plane topology. Non-congruent, as used in thiscontext, means having different logical topologies (e.g., different IPaddresses used for the ABRs and MSPs, even if the MSP is physicallyimplemented within or adjacent to the ABR). In the example of FIG. 2,unicast and congruent multicast transmissions communicate via respectiveABRs (e.g., using the IP addresses of the ABRs) while non-congruentmulticast transmission will communicate via the MSPs (e.g., using the IPaddresses of the MSPs). For example, in the example of FIG. 2, theunicast control plane topology is different than and substantiallylogically agnostic to the existence of the MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4), whilethe multicast control plane topology is different than and substantiallylogically agnostic to the existence of the ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4).However, the example MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) of the illustrated examplebridge the non-congruent topologies to provide multicast services viathe unicast data and control planes.

The example MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) of FIG. 2 may be implemented asservers that are separate and/or adjunct to the respective ABRs (e.g.,ABR1-ABR4), as separate hardware contained within the same physicalenclosure as the ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) (e.g., a line card, a separaterouting engine, etc.), as ingress PERs acting as adjunct servers for theABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4), and/or any combination thereof. As used herein,ingress, as applied to a PER, an ABR, and/or an MSP, refers to theserver at which unicast and/or multicast data enters the network 200from a source of the data (e.g., a unicast and/or multicast source at acustomer point of service). The term egress, as applied to a PER, anABR, and/or an MSP herein, refers to the server at which unicast and/ormulticast data exits the network to a destination or receiver of thedata (e.g., a unicast and/or multicast receiver at another customerpoint of service).

The example PERs of FIG. 2 are logically partitioned into differentsubsets and associated to respective ones of the MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4).In particular, the MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) act as the next-hop of thePERs (e.g., PER1-PER4) for multicast data, in a manner similar to theABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) being the next-hops of the PERs (e.g., PER1-PER4)for unicast data. Example MPLS-based networks, PERs, and/or ABRs thatmay be used to implement the example network 200, PERs (e.g.,PER1-PER4), and/or ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) of FIG. 2 are disclosed inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/885,168, filed on Sep. 17, 2010. Toachieve this partitioning, the example PERs and MSPs of the illustratedexample transmit multicast data using point-to-point label-switchedpaths (P2P LSP). In the example P2P LSP, an ingress router applies alabel to a data packet entering the network based on a forwardingequivalence class. Intermediate routers exchange the label on the packetwith another labels based on the next destination on the path from theingress router to an egress router, and the egress router removes thelabel from the data packet and forwards the packet based on anotherlayer, such as an Internet protocol address (e.g., IPv4, IPv6). The MSPsand the PERs of the illustrated example have a label binding and theMSPs have label bindings with each other, which creates P2P LSPs havingmultiple segments (e.g., independent sections of a path): (1) from aningress PER to an ingress MSP, (2) from an ingress MSP to an egress MSP,and (3) From an egress MSP to an egress PE. Accordingly, the exampleMSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) perform LSP stitching. As used herein, LSPstitching is defined as a mechanism where an end-to-end MPLS LSP can usean intermediate LSP to provide a segment of the path.

The example MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) and PERs (e.g., PER1-PER4) of FIG. 2manage multicast data on both the control plane and the data plane. Insome examples, the ABRs and PERs implement known methods of multicastdata transmission (e.g., the MSP is not used) until the multicast datatransmission meets one or more conditions, at which time the ingress PERinitiates a transition to a non-congruent topology. As a result of thetransition, MSPs and PERs switch the multicast data transmission to thenon-congruent topology. Example conditions triggering the switch to thenon-congruent topology include: 1) meeting or exceeding a data rate fromthe source, 2) meeting or exceeding a fan-out (e.g., number of branches,number of receiver nodes of the multicast data, and/or 3) a combinationof 1) and 2). In some other examples, the MSPs and PERs use thenon-congruent topology for all multicast data transmissions.

On the control plane, when the PERs determine that the non-congruenttopology is to be used for a multicast data transmission, the source(ingress) PER (e.g., PER1) triggers a BGP auto-discovery (A-D) route toall PERs in the MVPN (e.g., PER2, PER3, PER4, etc.). An example A-Droute contains a MVPN customer multicast route (e.g., (C-s, C-g)) andhas two attributes: a tag to request the receiver of the A-D route for aresponse, and a community identifier specifying either ingressreplication (IR) or hierarchical ingress replication (HIR). HIR isdisclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/963,338, filed Dec. 8,2010, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Uponreceiving the A-D route, each egress PER having receivers of themulticast data transmission coupled to the network 200 via the egressPER (e.g., PER3 and PER4) responds by sending a leaf A-D route and alabel directly to a respective upstream hop (e.g., an ingress PER). Ifthe community identifier is IR, the label specifies the MVPN multicast(e.g., (C-s, C-g)) in the egress PER. If the community identifier isHIR, the example egress PER (e.g., PER3, PER4) responds with a HIR leafA-D route to the upstream next hop (e.g., the egress MSPs, MSP3, MSP4).The HIR leaf A-D route propagates to the ingress PER (e.g., PER1) viathe ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1). The example HIR leaf A-D route includes alabel that specifies the multicast routes in the egress PER (e.g., PER3,PER4). Upon receiving the HIR leaf A-D routes, the egress MSPs (e.g.,MSP3, MSP4) respond by sending respective HIR leaf A-D routes to theingress MSP (e.g., MSP1), which is the upstream next hop to the ingressPER (e.g., PER1), with labels specifying the multicast routes in theegress MSPs (e.g., MSP3, MSP4). The example ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1)receives the HIR leaf A-D routes and responds with leaf A-D routes tothe ingress PER (e.g., PER1), including a label that specifies themulticast route in the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1).

When receiving a HIR leaf A-D route, the receiving MSP (e.g., MSP1-MSP4)updates a multicast group to associate the HIR leaf A-D route with themulticast group. For example, each of the MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4)maintains a multicast state table, which includes the source of themulticast data transmission (e.g., a source address), the receivers orgroup members of the multicast data transmission (e.g., a group address,receiver addresses, etc.), and/or the next-hop addresses and/or labelsassociated with the multicast data transmission. In some examples, theMSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) operate the control plane (e.g., to add and/ordrop receivers during the multicast data transmission) while multicastdata is being transmitted on the data plane.

When the source PER (e.g., PER1) receives leaf IR A-D routes from egressPERs (e.g., PER2), the source PER (e.g., PER1) replicates multicast datato the egress PER (e.g., PER2). In contrast, when the source PER (e.g.,PER1) receives HIR leaf A-D routes from the ingress MSPs (e.g., MSP1)and the MSPs and PERs are operating in the example non-congruenttopology, the source PER (e.g., PER1) replicates multicast packets tothe ingress MSPs (e.g., MSP1). The source PER (e.g., PER1) forwards themulticast packets similarly to unicast packets, including an inner labelreceived from either an egress PER (e.g., PER3, PER4) or the ingress MSP(e.g., MSP1), and an outer label (e.g., a Label Distribution Protocol(LDP) label) for the egress PER (e.g., PER2) or the ingress MSP (e.g.,MSP1). When the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) receives the multicast data, itreplicates the data to the egress MSPs (e.g., MSP3, MSP4). The ingressMSP (e.g., MSP1) replicates the multicast data, with an inner labelreceived from the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3, MSP4) (e.g., in the leaf A-Droute) and an outer label (e.g., a LDP label), for the egress MSP (e.g.,MSP3, MSP4). The multicast packets are forwarded through the corenetwork using MPLS label switching as used in unicast data forwarding.If the core network (e.g., the OSPF zero area 202) is running FastRe-Route (FRR) or traffic engineering (TE), an outer label is added bythe ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) and/or swapped as the packet travels throughthe OSPF zero area 202. Thus, the multicast packets are protected in thesame way as unicast packets. When an egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) receivesmulticast data, the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) replicates the data to oneor more egress PERs (e.g., PER3). The MSP (e.g., MSP3) forwards themulticast packets, with an inner label received from an egress PER(e.g., PER3) and an outer label (i.e., the LDP label), for the egressPER (e.g., PER3).

The example network 200 of FIG. 2 decouples the data plane technology inthe OSPF zero area 202 and each non-zero area 204, 206. The MSPs canserve as RPs and/or PIM surrogates for existing PIM-based MVPNapplications. On the control plane, the MSPs redistribute PIM controlmessages into BGP messages to other MSPs. On the data plane, the MSPsuse IR to forward multicast data received from the legacy PERs to remoteMSPs in the OSPF zero area 202. In the example network 200 of FIG. 2,the ABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) do not need to support large numbers ofmulticast states created by either PIM or P2MP MPLS based protocols,and/or do not need to support control planes required for HIR.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example MSP 300. The example MSP 300 maybe used to implement any or all of the example MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) ofFIG. 2 to provide a non-congruent topology for providing MVPN in an MPLSnetwork. The example MSP 300 of FIG. 3 includes an MVPN control planecontroller 302, an MVPN data plane controller 304, a multicast routingtable 306, and a multicast status monitor 308.

The example MVPN control plane controller 302 of FIG. 3 controls andmanages the control plane for providing MVPN via a network. The MVPNcontrol plane controller 302 of the illustrated example identifiescustomer multicast routes, stores the routes, and updates other MSPs inthe network with the customer multicast routes.

When the example MVPN control plane controller 302 of FIG. 3 receives aHIR leaf A-D route, the MVPN control plane controller 302 determines theupstream hop of the multicast transmission (e.g., the MSP or PER thatwill provide the multicast data to the MVPN control plane controller302) based on the router from which the HIR leaf A-D route is received.The MVPN control plane controller 302 also determines the downstream hop(e.g., the MSP or PER to which the multicast data will be replicated)based on a label contained in the HIR leaf A-D route. The example MVPNcontrol plane controller 302 stores both the upstream hop and thedownstream hop of the multicast flow in the multicast routing table 306(e.g., in association with the multicast data transmission, themulticast group, etc.). If one or more downstream hops are alreadystored in the multicast routing table for the multicast datatransmission (e.g., the multicast group), the example MVPN control planecontroller 302 adds the downstream hop to the multicast datatransmission, while the upstream hop does not change.

The example MVPN data plane controller 304 of FIG. 3 controls andmanages the data plane for providing MVPN via the network. The exampleMVPN data plane controller 304 of the illustrated example receivesmulticast data packets from an upstream router (e.g., a MSP, a PER),determines the label(s) to be applied to the multicast data packets, andreplicates the multicast data packets with the label(s) to one or moredownstream routers (e.g., a MSP, a PER).

Upon receiving a multicast data packet on the data plane, the exampleMVPN data plane controller 304 determines the multicast group based onthe label(s) in the multicast data packet. The MVPN data planecontroller 304 accesses the multicast routing table 306 to determine thedownstream hop(s) to which the multicast data packet is to bereplicated. If two or more receivers in the group have the samedownstream hop from the MSP 300, the example MVPN data plane controller304 replicates only one copy of the multicast data packet to thedownstream hop.

The example multicast routing table 306 of FIG. 3 stores multicastroutes (e.g., determined by the MVPN control plane controller 302) andprovides stored multicast routes (e.g., requested by the MVPN data planecontroller 304). As mentioned above, the multicast receiver routesstored in the multicast routing table 306 may include a sourceidentifier, a group identifier, an upstream hop, a downstream hop,and/or any additional information for the receiver of the examplemulticast data stream.

The example multicast status monitor 308 of FIG. 3 monitors the statusof the multicast data transmissions occurring in the network. In someexamples, the multicast status monitor 308 monitors a multicasttransmission to determine the fan-out (e.g., the number of receivers ofthe multicast transmission) and to determine the data rate (e.g., theamount of data being sent per unit of time by the multicast datasource). In the example of FIG. 3, if either the fan-out, the data rate,or a product or other combination of the fan-out and the data rateexceeds a corresponding threshold, the multicast status monitor 308receives a signal (e.g., from an ingress PER) via the MVPN control planecontroller 302 to change the multicast transmission from a congruenttopology such as that described in connection with FIG. 1 to thenon-congruent topology. In some examples, the multicast status monitor308 may determine that the multicast transmission is to change to thenon-congruent topology in response to receiving an auto-discovery routefrom a downstream node (e.g., an egress MSP, an egress PER), which mayoccur in response to the ingress PER determining that the multicasttransmission is to change to the non-congruent topology. In this manner,the multicast status monitor 308 enables use of the higher bandwidthefficiency of the congruent topology until the fan-out and/or the datarate of a multicast transmission merits a sacrifice in bandwidthefficiency for improved control plane resource usage.

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate a network 400 during an example method toinitialize a multicast path for a multicast transmission. The methodillustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B may occur at the initialization of amulticast data transmission or at the occurrence of an event (e.g., thefan-out and/or the data rate of an existing multicast data transmissionexceeds a corresponding threshold).

FIG. 4A illustrates the example network 400, including a plurality ofcontrol plane communications. As illustrated in FIG. 4A, the examplenetwork 400 includes an OSPF zero area 402 and two OSPF non-zero areas404, 406. In the OSPF zero area 402, the example network 400 includesABRs (e.g., ABR1-ABR4) and MSPs (e.g., MSP1-MSP4) in communication withthe corresponding ABRs. The example network 400 of FIG. 4 also includesa route reflector RR. In the example of FIG. 4A, the route reflector RRacts as a centralized peering server for the PERs (e.g., PER1-PER6). Forthe illustrated multicast data transmission, the source of the multicastdata connects to the network 400 via a first PER (e.g., PER1), whilereceivers of the multicast data connect to the network 400 via otherrespective PERs (e.g., PER4, PER5, and PER6).

The example OSPF non-zero area M 404 includes two PERs (e.g., PER1,PER2), which connect customers to the network 400. The first PER (e.g.,PER1) is communicatively coupled to the ABR1 and MSP1 and the second PER(e.g., PER2) is communicatively coupled to the ABR2 and MSP2 for thepurposes of the non-congruent multicast topology. The example OSPFnon-zero area N 406 includes four PERs (e.g., PER3, PER4, PER5, PER6).Two of the PERs (e.g., PER3, PER4) are communicatively coupled to theABR3 and MSP3 and the other two PERs (e.g., PER5, PER6) arecommunicatively coupled to the ABR4 and MSP4 for the purposes of thenon-congruent multicast topology.

When the ingress PER (e.g., PER1) determines that the multicast datatransmission is to use a non-congruent topology, the PER1 signals (1)the egress PERs (e.g., PER3, PER4) to initialize the non-congruenttopology. The PER1 advertises (2) a BGP auto-discovery (A-D) route witha leaf flag and a segmented LSP community for HIR to the route reflectorRR. The route reflector RR reflects (3) the A-D route to the PERs (e.g.,PER3-PER6).

In the example of FIG. 4A, when the PER3 receives the HIR A-D route fromthe RR, the PER3 does not respond because no receivers are connected tothe network 400 via the PER3. In contrast, in the example of FIG. 4A thePER4 determines that the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) is the upstream nexthop to reach the ingress PER (e.g., PER1). PER4 responds to the HIR A-Droute by sending (4) a leaf route to the MSP3, the leaf route includinga label (L4) identifying the PER4. Similarly, the PER5 and PER6determine that the egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) is the upstream next hop toreach the ingress PER (e.g., PER1). PER5 and PER6 respond to the HIR A-Droutes by sending (5) HIR leaf A-D routes to the MSP4. The PER5 includesa label (L5) identifying MVPN multicast route in the PER5, and the PER6includes a label (L6) identifying MVPN multicast route in the PER6.

The example MSP3 of FIG. 4 receives the HIR leaf A-D route from thePER4, determines that the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) is the upstream nexthop to reach the ingress (e.g., PER1), attaches a label (L3) to the HIRleaf A-D route and sends (6) the updated HIR leaf A-D route to the MSP1.The MSP4 receives the HIR leaf A-D routes from the PER5 and the PER6.The MSP4 determines that the MSP1 is the upstream next hop to reach thePER1, attaches a label (L2) to the HIR leaf A-D route, and sends (7) theupdated HIR leaf A-D route to the MSP1. The example label L2 identifiesthe MVPN route in the MSP4. The example MSP1 receives the respective HIRleaf A-D routes from the MSP3 and MSP4, attaches a label (L1), and sends(8) the HIR leaf A-D routes to the PER1. The example label L1 identifiesthe MVPN multicast route in the MSP1. When the PER1 receives the HIRleaf A-D routes from the MSP1, the PER1 ceases to replicate multicastdata directly to the PERs (e.g., PER4-PER6) (if the PER1 was previouslyproviding multicast data to the PERs via a congruent topology) andbegins replicating multicast data to the MSP1.

FIG. 4B illustrates the example network 400 of FIG. 4A and a number ofdata plane communications to provide multicast data from a source to anumber of receivers. The example data plane communications illustratedin FIG. 4B occur during and/or after the example control planecommunications of FIG. 4A. In the example of FIG. 4B, the source of amulticast data transmission sends (1) an example multicast data packetto the ingress PER (e.g., PER1). The multicast data packet includes thecustomer multicast (C-mcast) data.

The example ingress PER (e.g., PER1) of FIG. 4B receives and replicates(2) the received multicast data. In replicating the multicast data via anon-congruent topology, the example ingress PER (e.g., PER1) adds aninner label (L1) corresponding to the label received from the MSP1 inthe HIR leaf A-D route of FIG. 4A. The transmission of the multicastdata from the ingress PER (e.g., PER1) to the MSP1 (e.g., from theingress OSPF non-zero area 404 to the OSPF zero area 402) is a unicasttransmission to implement a first segment of a segmented LSP, andincludes an LDP label to facilitate transmission to the MSP1.

The example ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) receives the unicast transmissionfrom the ingress PER (e.g., PER1). The example ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1)determines the paths to be used to transmit the multicast data to thereceivers (e.g., via the multicast state table 306 of FIG. 3). In theexample of FIG. 4B, the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) is to replicate thedata to the egress MSPs (e.g., MSP3, MSP4) via the OSPF zero area 402(e.g., the core network). The ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) generates a firstunicast LSP packet to the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3), and includes theappropriate label (L2) corresponding to the label in the HIR leaf A-Droute received from the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3). Similarly, the ingressMSP (e.g., MSP1) generates a second unicast LSP packet to the egress MSP(e.g., MSP4), and includes the appropriate label (L3) corresponding tothe label in the HIR leaf A-D route received from the egress MSP (e.g.,MSP4). In the example of FIG. 4B, the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) furtheradds respective LDP labels and Resource Reservation Protocol-TrafficEngineering (RSVP-TE) labels to facilitate transmission to the egressMSPs (e.g., MSP3, MSP4) and/or for rapid restoration of lost datapackets. The ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) sends (e.g., replicates) (3) themulticast data packets as unicast packets to the respective ones of theegress MSPs (e.g., MSP3, MSP4).

The example egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) receives the unicast transmissionfrom the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1). The example egress MSP (e.g., MSP3)determines the paths to be used to transmit the multicast data to thereceivers (e.g., via a multicast state table). Based on the determinedreceivers and/or paths, the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) generates a unicastLSP packet to be sent to the egress PER (e.g., PER4). The generatedpacket includes the C-mcast data, an inner label (L4) based on the HIRleaf A-D route the egress MSP (e.g., MSP3) received from the egress PER(e.g., PER4), and an LDP label to reach the PER4. The egress MSP (e.g.,MSP3) sends (4) the multicast data packet as a unicast packet to theegress PER (e.g., PER4). The egress PER (e.g., PER4) removes the labelsand forwards (5) the multicast data in the data packet to one or morereceivers of the multicast data transmission.

The example egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) receives the unicast transmissionfrom the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1). The example egress MSP (e.g., MSP4)determines the paths to be used to transmit the multicast data to thereceivers (e.g., via a multicast state table). In the example of FIG.4B, receivers of the multicast data access the network through theegress PERs (e.g., PER5, PER6), which are communicatively coupled to theegress MSP (e.g., MSP4). Based on the determined receivers and/or paths,the egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) generates unicast LSP packets to be sent tothe egress PERs (e.g., PER5, PER6). A first generated packet to be sentto the egress PER (e.g., PER5) includes the C-mcast data, an inner label(L5) based on the HIR leaf A-D route the egress MSP (e.g., MSP4)received from the egress PER (e.g., PER5), and an LDP label to reach theegress PER5. A second generated packet to be sent to the egress PER(e.g., PER6) includes the C-mcast data, an inner label (L6) based on theHIR leaf A-D route the egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) received from the egressPER (e.g., PER6), and an LDP label. The egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) sends(e.g., replicates) (6) the multicast data packets as unicast packets tothe respective egress PERs (e.g., PER5, PER6). The PERs (e.g., PER5,PER6) each remove the respective labels and forward (7) the multicastdata in the data packets to one or more receivers of the multicast datatransmission.

The example data plane communications illustrated in FIG. 4B may providedifferent multicast data from the ingress PER (e.g., PER1) to the egressPERs (e.g., PER4-PER6) directly. Additionally, the data planecommunications may be altered based on additional control planecommunications, which may add and/or drop sources and/or receivers ofmulticast data.

While an example manner of implementing the MSP 300 has been illustratedin FIG. 3, one or more of the elements, processes and/or devicesillustrated in FIG. 3 may be combined, divided, re-arranged, omitted,eliminated and/or implemented in any other way. Further, the exampleMVPN control plane controller 302, the example MVPN data planecontroller 304, the example multicast routing table 306, the examplemulticast status monitor 308 and/or, more generally, the example MSP 300of FIG. 3 may be implemented by hardware, software, firmware and/or anycombination of hardware, software and/or firmware. Thus, for example,any of MVPN control plane controller 302, the example MVPN data planecontroller 304, the example multicast routing table 306, the examplemulticast status monitor 308 and/or, more generally, the example MSP 300of FIG. 3 could be implemented by one or more circuit(s), programmableprocessor(s), application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC(s)),programmable logic device(s) (PLD(s)) and/or field programmable logicdevice(s) (FPLD(s)), etc. When any of the appended apparatus or systemclaims are read to cover a purely software and/or firmwareimplementation, at least one of MVPN control plane controller 302, theexample MVPN data plane controller 304, the example multicast routingtable 306, the example multicast status monitor 308 are hereby expresslydefined to include a tangible computer readable medium such as a memory,DVD, CD, etc. storing the software and/or firmware. Further still, theexample MSP 300 of FIG. 3 may include one or more elements, processesand/or devices in addition to, or instead of, those illustrated in FIG.3, and/or may include more than one of any or all of the illustratedelements, processes and devices.

Flowcharts representative of example machine readable instructions forimplementing the MSP 300 of FIG. 3 are shown in FIGS. 5A, 5B, 6A, and6B. In these examples, the machine readable instructions compriseprogram(s) for execution by a processor such as the processor 712 shownin the example processor platform 700 discussed below in connection withFIG. 7. The program may be embodied in software stored on a tangiblecomputer readable medium such as a CD-ROM, a floppy disk, a hard drive,a digital versatile disk (DVD), or a memory associated with theprocessor 712, but the entire program and/or parts thereof couldalternatively be executed by a device other than the processor 712and/or embodied in firmware or dedicated hardware. Further, although theexample program(s) are described with reference to the flowchartsillustrated in FIGS. 5A, 5B, 6A, and 6B, many other methods ofimplementing the MSP 300 may alternatively be used. For example, theorder of execution of the blocks may be changed, and/or some of theblocks described may be changed, eliminated, or combined.

As mentioned above, the example processes of FIGS. 5A, 5B, 6A, and 6Bmay be implemented using coded instructions (e.g., computer readableinstructions) stored on a tangible computer readable medium such as ahard disk drive, a flash memory, a read-only memory (ROM), a compactdisk (CD), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a cache, a random-accessmemory (RAM) and/or any other storage media in which information isstored for any duration (e.g., for extended time periods, permanently,brief instances, for temporarily buffering, and/or for caching of theinformation). As used herein, the term tangible computer readable mediumis expressly defined to include any type of computer readable storageand to exclude propagating signals. Additionally or alternatively, theexample processes of FIGS. 5A, 5B, 6A, and 6B may be implemented usingcoded instructions (e.g., computer readable instructions) stored on anon-transitory computer readable medium such as a hard disk drive, aflash memory, a read-only memory, a compact disk, a digital versatiledisk, a cache, a random-access memory and/or any other storage media inwhich information is stored for any duration (e.g., for extended timeperiods, permanently, brief instances, for temporarily buffering, and/orfor caching of the information). As used herein, the term non-transitorycomputer readable medium is expressly defined to include any type ofcomputer readable medium and to exclude propagating signals.

FIGS. 5A-5B are a flowchart representative of example machine readableinstructions which may be executed to implement an example ingress MSP.FIGS. 6A-6B are a flowchart representative of example machine readableinstructions which may be executed to implement an example egress MSP.The ingress MSP and/or the egress MSP may be implemented by the exampleMSP 300 of FIG. 3. The example instructions 500 of FIGS. 5A-5B will bedescribed below with reference to the example ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1)of FIGS. 4A-4B and the example MSP 300 of FIG. 3. The exampleinstructions 600 of FIGS. 6A-6B will be described below with referenceto the example egress MSP (e.g., MSP4) of FIGS. 4A-4B and the exampleMSP 300 of FIG. 3. However, because any or all of the MSPs (e.g.,MSP1-MSP4) of FIGS. 2, 4A, and 4B may be either or both an ingress MSPand an egress MSP, the example instructions 500, 600 may be implementedin any of the example MSPs. The example instructions 502-508 illustratedin FIG. 5A and the example instructions 602-608 illustrated in FIG. 6Amay be considered to occur on the multicast control plane, while theexample instructions 510-526 illustrated in FIG. 5B and the exampleinstructions 610-626 illustrated in FIG. 6B may be considered to occuron the multicast data plane.

The example instructions 500 begin in FIG. 5A when an ingress PERdetermines that a multicast data flow is to be converted to anon-congruent topology. For example, the ingress PER may determine thata non-congruent topology is to be used when a multicast datatransmission begins and/or when one or more characteristic (e.g.,fan-out, data rate, or both) of the multicast data transmission exceedsa threshold.

An ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1 of FIG. 4A) determines whether a HIR leaf A-Droute has been received (block 502). If a HIR leaf A-D route has beenreceived (block 502), the example MSP1 (e.g., via the MVPN control planecontroller 302 of FIG. 3) performs a route lookup for an upstream nexthop of an ingress PER (block 504). The MVPN control plane controller 302stores the HIR leaf A-D route in a multicast routing table (e.g., themulticast routing table 306 of FIG. 3) (block 506). An example storedHIR leaf A-D route includes the MVPN customer multicast group (e.g., asource identifier, a group identifier, etc.), an upstream hop (e.g., theingress PER1 for the MSP1), and a downstream hop (e.g., the router MSPfrom which the HIR leaf A-D route was received, the MSP3 or MSP4 forMSP1). The MVPN control plane controller 302 adds a label (e.g., a labelidentifying and/or corresponding to a MVPN multicast route, such as(C-s, C-g), in the MSP1) to the HIR leaf A-D route packet and sends theHIR leaf A-D route packet to the ingress PER1 (block 508).

After sending the leaf route packet (block 508) and/or if a HIR leaf A-Droute has not been received (block 502), control moves to FIG. 5B inwhich the egress MSP (e.g., the MVPN data plane controller 304 of FIG.3) performs a route lookup from the multicast routing table (e.g., themulticast routing table 306) (block 512). The MVPN data plane controller304 determines whether to accept the multicast data based on whether theinner label of the multicast data contains a label sent (e.g., by theingress MSP) to the upstream hop (e.g., the ingress PER) (block 514). Ifthe inner label does not contain such a label (block 514), the exampleMVPN data plane controller 304 drops the multicast data packet (block516). If the inner label contains the sent by the ingress MSP toupstream ingress PER (block 514), the ingress MSP determines one or moredownstream egress MSPs from which it received HIR leaf A-D routes (block518). The example received HIR leaf A-D route(s) are generated in block506 of FIG. 5A.

The example instructions 500 enter a loop 520, which iterates for eachdestination egress MSP from which the ingress MSP received one or moreHIR leaf A-D routes. The example MVPN data plane controller 304 replacesan inner label of the received multicast data packet with an inner labelreceived from the egress MSP (block 522). The example MVPN data planecontroller 304 adds an outer label specifying the egress MSP andreplicates the multicast data packet to the egress MSP via a unicastpath (block 524). After replicating the multicast data packet (block524), the example loop 520 iterates for the next receiver route.

After the loop 520 ends (e.g., all destination egress MSPs have beenprocessed by the loop 520), or if the multicast data is dropped (block516), control returns to block 502 of FIG. 5A to determine whether a HIRleaf A-D route has been received.

The example instructions 600 begin in FIG. 6A when an ingress PERdetermines that a multicast data flow is to be converted to anon-congruent topology. For example, the ingress PER may determine thata non-congruent topology is to be used when a multicast datatransmission begins and/or when one or more characteristic (e.g.,fan-out, data rate, or both) of the multicast data transmission exceedsa threshold.

An egress MSP (e.g., MSP4 of FIG. 4A) determines whether a HIR leaf A-Droute has been received (block 602). If a HIR leaf A-D route has beenreceived (block 602), the example MSP4 (e.g., via the MVPN control planecontroller 302 of FIG. 3) performs a route lookup for an upstream nexthop of an ingress MSP (block 604). The MVPN control plane controller 302stores the HIR leaf A-D route in a multicast routing table (e.g., themulticast routing table 306 of FIG. 3) (block 606). An example storedHIR leaf A-D route includes the MVPN customer multicast group (e.g., asource identifier, a group identifier, etc.), an upstream hop (e.g., theingress MSP1 for the egress MSP4), and a downstream hop (e.g., therouters PER5, PER6 from which the HIR leaf A-D route was received). TheMVPN control plane controller 302 adds a label (e.g., a labelidentifying and/or corresponding to a MVPN multicast route, such as(C-s, C-g), in the MSP1) to the HIR leaf A-D route packet and sends theHIR leaf A-D route packet to the ingress MSP (e.g., MSP1) (block 608).

After sending the leaf route packet (block 608) and/or if a HIR leaf A-Droute has not been received (block 602), control moves to FIG. 6B inwhich the egress MSP (e.g., via the MVPN data plane controller 304 ofFIG. 3) performs a route lookup from the multicast routing table (e.g.,the multicast routing table 306) (block 612). The MVPN data planecontroller 304 determines whether to accept the multicast data based onwhether the inner label of the multicast data contains a label sent(e.g., by the egress MSP) to the upstream hop (e.g., the ingress MSP)(block 614). If the inner label does not contain such a label (block614), the example MVPN data plane controller 304 drops the multicastdata packet (block 616). If the inner label contains the sent by theegress MSP to upstream ingress MSP (block 614), the egress MSPdetermines one or more downstream egress PERs from which it received HIRleaf A-D routes (block 618). The example received HIR leaf A-D route(s)are generated in block 606 of FIG. 6A.

The example instructions 600 enter a loop 620, which iterates for eachdestination egress PER from which the egress MSP received one or moreHIR leaf A-D routes. The example MVPN data plane controller 304 replacesan inner label of the received multicast data packet with an inner labelreceived from the egress PER (block 522). The example MVPN data planecontroller 304 adds an outer label specifying the egress PER andreplicates the multicast data packet to the egress PER via a unicastpath (block 624). After replicating the multicast data packet (block624), the example loop 520 iterates for the next receiver route.

After the loop 620 ends (e.g., all destination egress PERs have beenprocessed by the loop 520), or if the multicast data is dropped (block616), control returns to block 502 of FIG. 6A to determine whether a HIRleaf A-D route has been received.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example processing system 700 capable ofimplementing the apparatus and methods disclosed herein. The processingsystem 700 can be, for example, a server, a personal computer, a router,an Internet appliance, or any other type of computing device.

The system 700 of the instant example includes a processor 712 such as ageneral purpose programmable processor. The processor 712 includes alocal memory 714, and executes coded instructions 716 present in thelocal memory 714 and/or in another memory device. The processor 712 mayexecute, among other things, the machine readable instructionsrepresented in FIGS. 5A-6B. The processor 712 may be any type ofprocessing unit, such as one or more Intel® microprocessors from thePentium® family, the Itanium® family and/or the XScale® family, one ormore microcontrollers from the ARM® and/or PIC® families ofmicrocontrollers, etc. Of course, other processors from other familiesare also appropriate.

The processor 712 is in communication with a main memory including avolatile memory 718 and a non-volatile memory 720 via a bus 722. Thevolatile memory 718 may be implemented by Static Random Access Memory(SRAM), Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), Dynamic RandomAccess Memory (DRAM), RAMBUS Dynamic Random Access Memory (RDRAM) and/orany other type of random access memory device. The non-volatile memory720 may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type ofmemory device. Access to the main memory 718, 720 is typicallycontrolled by a memory controller (not shown).

The processing system 700 also includes an interface circuit 724. Theinterface circuit 724 may be implemented by any type of interfacestandard, such as an Ethernet interface, a universal serial bus (USB),and/or a third generation input/output (3GIO) interface.

One or more input devices 726 are connected to the interface circuit724. The input device(s) 726 permit a user to enter data and commandsinto the processor 712. The input device(s) can be implemented by, forexample, a keyboard, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball,an isopoint and/or a voice recognition system.

One or more output devices 728 are also connected to the interfacecircuit 724. The output devices 728 can be implemented, for example, bydisplay devices (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a cathode ray tubedisplay (CRT)), by a printer and/or by speakers. The interface circuit724, thus, typically includes a graphics driver card.

The interface circuit 724 also includes a communication device such as amodem or network interface card to facilitate exchange of data withexternal computers via a network (e.g., an Ethernet connection, adigital subscriber line (DSL), a telephone line, coaxial cable, acellular telephone system, etc.).

The processing system 700 also includes one or more mass storage devices730 for storing machine readable instructions and data. Examples of suchmass storage devices 730 include floppy disk drives, hard drive disks,compact disk drives and digital versatile disk (DVD) drives.

The coded instructions 732 of FIGS. 7-11 may be stored in the massstorage device 730, in the volatile memory 718, in the non-volatilememory 720, in the local memory 714 and/or on a removable storagemedium, such as a CD or DVD 732.

From the foregoing, it should be apparent that example methods,apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosed herein providescalable, sustainable and flexible network to provide MVPN services.Example methods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosedherein forward multicast packets through a core network in substantiallythe same way as unicast packets, which reduces and/or eliminates controlplane resources used by backbone routers to support MVPN. Instead,existing unicast engineering tools, such as Fast Re-Route or trafficengineering can be applied to the multicast traffic, and the existingunicast network management tools (e.g., Netflow), performancemeasurements (e.g., World-wide IP Performance Measurement (WIPM)), andtroubleshooting procedures are applicable to multicast packets. Examplemethods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosed herein donot implement multicast states in non-scalable core routers that havelimited control plane resources, and do not suffer performance penaltiesdue to churn from handling short-lived multicast flows. On the contrary,example methods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture disclosedherein allow growth of multicast by, for example, partitioning PERs intodifferent subsets and associating them to different MSPs. Examplemethods, apparatus, and/or articles of manufacture improve the multicastcustomer experience to be similar or equal to the unicast customerexperience.

Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacturehave been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is notlimited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods,apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope ofthe claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: sending a multicastreceiver route received from a first one of a multicast serviceprocessor and a provider edge router to a second one of the multicastservice processor and the provider edge router, the multicast serviceprocessor is being communicatively coupled to the provider edge routervia a multicast control plane topology that is non-congruent to aunicast control plane topology; and replicating multicast data receivedfrom the second one of the multicast service processor and the provideredge router to the first one of the provider edge router and themulticast service processor based on the multicast receiver route, thereplicating of the multicast data including transmitting the multicastdata via a unicast route.
 2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein themulticast receiver route includes a hierarchical ingress replicationleaf auto-discovery route.
 3. A method as defined in claim 1, furtherincluding applying a first label to the multicast data, the first labelidentifying the multicast service processor when the multicast receiverroute is received from the multicast service processor.
 4. A method asdefined in claim 3, wherein first label is a Label Distribution Protocollabel and a resource reservation protocol label.
 5. A method as definedin claim 3, further including: storing the multicast receiver route intoa multicast routing table; and determining an outer label from themulticast routing table.
 6. A method as defined in claim 5, whereinstoring the multicast receiver route is based on a second label in themulticast receiver route.
 7. A method as defined in claim 6, furtherincluding applying a third label to the multicast receiver route priorto sending the multicast receiver route.
 8. A method as defined in claim6, wherein the second label is generated based on border gatewayprotocol.
 9. A method as defined in claim 1, further including sending asecond multicast receiver route received from a third multicast serviceprocessor to the provider edge router.
 10. A method as defined in claim9, further including replicating the multicast data to the thirdmulticast service processor based on the second multicast receiverroute.
 11. A method as defined in claim 1, further including sending asecond multicast receiver route received from a third provider edgerouter to the multicast service processor.
 12. A method as defined inclaim 11, further including replicating the multicast data to the thirdprovider edge router based on the second multicast receiver route.
 13. Amulticast service processor comprising: a control plane controller toreceive a first multicast receiver route, to store the first multicastreceiver route, and to send a second multicast receiver route to one ofa second multicast service processor and a first provider edge router,the second multicast receiver route based on the first multicastreceiver route, wherein the first multicast service processor iscommunicatively coupled to the first provider edge router via amulticast control plane topology that is non-congruent to a unicastcontrol plane topology; a multicast status monitor to determine whetherto convert from a congruent multicast control plane topology to anon-congruent multicast control plane topology; and a data planecontroller to replicate first multicast data received from at least oneof the second multicast service processor and the first provider edgerouter based on the first multicast receiver route.
 14. A multicastservice processor as defined in claim 13, wherein the control planecontroller is to store the first multicast receiver route in associationwith a multicast data transmission having a source node communicativelycoupled to one of the first provider edge router and a second provideredge router associated with the second multicast service processor. 15.A multicast service processor as defined in claim 13, wherein thecontrol plane controller is to generate the second multicast receiverroute by at least removing a first label representative of at least oneof the second multicast service processor and the first provider edgerouter and adding a second label representative of the multicast serviceprocessor.
 16. A multicast service processor as defined in claim 15,wherein the data plane controller is to replicate the first multicastdata based on the first label.
 17. A multicast service processor asdefined in claim 13, wherein the multicast service processor correspondsto an area border router in an Open Switched Path First network, thecontrol plane controller to maintain a multicast control plane separatefrom a unicast control plane maintained by the area border router.
 18. Acomputer readable medium including machine readable instructions which,when executed, cause a processor to perform operations comprising:sending a multicast receiver route received from a multicast serviceprocessor to a provider edge router; and replicating multicast datareceived from the provider edge router to the multicast serviceprocessor based on the multicast receiver route, the replicating of themulticast data including transmitting the multicast data via a unicastroute.
 19. A computer readable medium as defined in claim 18, whereinthe operations further include applying a first label to the multicastdata, the first label to identify the multicast service processor whenthe multicast receiver route is received from the multicast serviceprocessor.
 20. A computer readable medium as defined in claim 19,wherein the operations further include determining the first label froma multicast routing table.
 21. A computer readable medium as defined inclaim 18, wherein the multicast service processor is communicativelycoupled to the provider edge router via a multicast control planetopology that is non-congruent to a unicast control plane topology. 22.An apparatus, comprising: a processor; and a computer readable storagedevice including computer readable instructions which, when executed bythe processor, cause the processor perform operations comprising:sending a multicast receiver route received from a first one of amulticast service processor and a provider edge router to a second oneof the multicast service processor and the provider edge router, themulticast service processor being communicatively coupled to theprovider edge router via a multicast control plane topology that isnon-congruent to a unicast control plane topology; and replicatingmulticast data received from the second one of the multicast serviceprocessor and the provider edge router to the first one of the provideredge router and the multicast service processor based on the multicastreceiver route by transmitting the multicast data via a unicast route.23. An apparatus as defined in claim 22, wherein the multicast receiverroute includes a hierarchical ingress replication leaf auto-discoveryroute.
 24. An apparatus as defined in claim 22, wherein the operationsfurther include applying a first label to the multicast data, the firstlabel identifying the multicast service processor when the multicastreceiver route is received from the multicast service processor.
 25. Anapparatus as defined in claim 24, wherein first label is a LabelDistribution Protocol label and a resource reservation protocol label.26. An apparatus as defined in claim 24, wherein the operations furtherinclude: storing the multicast receiver route into a multicast routingtable; and determining an outer label from the multicast routing table.27. An apparatus as defined in claim 26, wherein the operations furtherinclude storing the multicast receiver route based on a second label inthe multicast receiver route.
 28. An apparatus as defined in claim 27,wherein the operations further include applying a third label to themulticast receiver route prior to sending the multicast receiver route.29. An apparatus as defined in claim 22, wherein the operations furtherinclude sending a second multicast receiver route received from a thirdmulticast service processor to the provider edge router.
 30. Anapparatus as defined in claim 23, wherein the operations further includereplicating the multicast data to the third multicast service processorbased on the second multicast receiver route.
 31. An apparatus asdefined in claim 22, wherein the operations further include sending asecond multicast receiver route received from a third provider edgerouter to the multicast service processor.
 32. A multicast serviceprocessor, comprising: a control plane controller to receive a firstmulticast receiver route, to store the first multicast receiver route,and to send a second multicast receiver route to one of a secondmulticast service processor and a first provider edge router, the secondmulticast receiver route based on the first multicast receiver route,the multicast service processor being communicatively coupled to thefirst provider edge router via a multicast control plane topology thatis non-congruent to a unicast control plane topology, the secondmulticast service processor corresponding to an area border router in anOpen Switched Path First network, the control plane controller tomaintain a multicast control plane separate from a unicast control planemaintained by the area border router; and a data plane controller toreplicate first multicast data received from at least one of the secondmulticast service processor and the first provider edge router based onthe first multicast receiver route by sending a unicast data packet viathe area border router.
 33. A computer readable medium including machinereadable instructions which, when executed, cause a processor to performoperations comprising: sending a multicast receiver route received froma provider edge router to a multicast service processor; and replicatingmulticast data received from the multicast service processor to theprovider edge router based on the multicast receiver route, thereplicating of the multicast data including transmitting the multicastdata via a unicast route.
 34. A computer readable medium as defined inclaim 33, wherein the operations further include applying a first labelto the multicast data, the first label to identify the multicast serviceprocessor when the multicast receiver route is received from themulticast service processor.
 35. A computer readable medium as definedin claim 34, wherein the operations further including determining thefirst label from a multicast routing table.
 36. A computer readablemedium as defined in claim 33, wherein the multicast service processoris communicatively coupled to the provider edge router via a multicastcontrol plane topology that is non-congruent to a unicast control planetopology.